provided by PORE -- last update (96aug13)
(USA vs WILHELM REICH) 1955
NEWSPAPER ARTICLES


AREA is under construction more to come in time to fill in gaps.

News is copyright of Portland Press Herald / Portland Sunday Telegram, and used here by permission. This publication is provided for the personal use of PORE viewers, and may not be redistributed, in whole or in part without the expressed permission, of Portland Newspapers - Portland, Maine USA.



October 19, 1955 Portland Press Herald page 22

DRS. REICH AND SILVERT DENY CONTEMPT IN HEARING HERE

Dr. Wilhelm Reich, Rangeley, and Dr. Michael Silvert, New York, pleaded innocent in Federal Court yesterday afternoon to an amended criminal contempt action.
The revised action is more specific concerning acts the government claims Dr. Silvert committed in violation of a court order to call in and junk orgone energy accumulators Dr. Reich developed;
Both pleaded innocent to the original contempt action last July 26.
The case was continued to Nov. 4 for consideration of other defense motions.
Dr. Reih said he had a motion to make involving: "rnisrepresentation of factsl". to the court. Judge John D. Clifford Jr. said it could not be submitted in detail now but could be filed before the Nov. 4 hearing. District Attorney Peter Mills asked Judge Clifford to set $2,000 bail. But Judge Clifford said if they didn't appear,. it wouldn't. be any great difficulty to bring them to court.

DR. REICH, acting as his own attorney, contended that "illegal methods were used to get the complaint into court" and added that the court lacked jurisdicion over natural science.
If lawyers and politicians are allowed to decide what is right, the future of science and research "is gone 'to the dogs," Dr. Reich, declared.
He said he had been presented to the court as a crook, a swindler," and added that he is a well known man in the field of science.
Judge Clifford replied that it is widely known that Dr. Reich is honored and respected in his profession.
Judgments by counsel for Dr. Silvert and Dr. Reich were made on a motion asking dismissal of the original injunction of March, 1954. Judge Clifford denied this request.

THE DEFENSE argued that lacked jurisdiction over science, portions of the injunctive order were invalid because it represented action without authority or action in excess of authority and that orgone energy has a right to flourish.
The heart of the proceeding, defense counsel, said, is the Food & Drug Administration's complaint that orgone energy is a psuedo science.
Counsel added that physicians licensed to practice medicine are issuing accumulators on presciptions, while the Food & Drug Administration contends that claims the devices will cure are false.
The Food & Drug Administration, Louis Maguire, of Washington, D. C., government counsel declared in his rebuttal is "not guilty of misrepresentation in any case."
Maguire said that Dr. Silvert's claims, including the court's lack of jurisdiction, have been denied from Maine's Federal Court, through the First Circuit Court of Appeals up to the U. S. Supreme Court.

HE SAID the Supreme Court Oct.10 refused to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari askiing for a review of the case in which Dr. Silvert and 14 other widely known medical men and pyschiatrists, sought to intervene in the injunction action which Dr. Reich allowed to go by default.
Now, Maguire said, Dr. Silvert is raising the same questions as a defendant in a defendent in a criminal contempt action.



Nov. 4, 1955 Portland Press Herald page 7

ORGONE ENERGY CONTEMPT TRIAL WILL OPEN DEC. 1

Trial of the two proponents of orgone energy, accused of criminal contempt for having failed to comply with an injunction, will open in Federal Court at 10 a.m. Dec. 1.
Dr. Wilhelm Reich, Rangeley researcher, and Dr. Michael Silvert, New York, have pleaded innocent to the charge they did not call in and junk orgone accumulators and literature as ordered by the court last year.
Both psychiatrists acted as their own counsel at the hearing yesterday afternoon on four motions, including one to dismiss the contempt action and establish "Boards on Pathology" in the U.S. Courts.
Judge John D. Clifford Jr. said he had no authority to establish such a board.

Dr. REICH said his proposal would be a medical and educational approach, for, he added, the accumulators "have to do with atomic energy."
Other motions denied included one asking for the dismissal of amended criminal information on the ground of "illegal misrepresentation, concealment of pertinent facts and illigal proceedural maneuvering contrary to fact, truth and justice x x x."
The court also overruled Dr. Reich in his claim that the action should be civil iinstead of criminal.
Dr. Reich argued that the issue wasn't whether orgonomy is a science, but rather was the injunction issued on facts or opinion.

JUDGE CLIFFORD reminded Dr. Reich that he had allowed to go by default his opportunity to appear in court and contest he complaint of the Pure Food Drug Administration.
The government claims the accumulator devices are worthless. The defense contends they are capable of capturing healing agencies from the atmosphere.
Dr. Reich said he didn't "dare" to appear at the time he allowed the complaint to go by default. He said the case concerned espionage.
Judge Clifford told him he should report his claim to the FBI. Dr. Reich said he already had done so.

Exchange Orgonomic Research and Information
Around The World  Through PORE



  LE FastCounter    In effect on several pages since October 16, 1998