Wilhelm Reich and orgone provided by PORE = Public Orgonomic Research Exchange -- **last update (2003feb12) ---© Copyright 1995-2006

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:48:23 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <199602231158.LAA29489@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>
Received: by pore@mainelink.net; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 07:04:46 -0500
From: Marko Heckel heckel@rcs1.urz.tu-dresden.dede
Subject: help for demoexp of orgone

Hallo

Some friends of mine and me wish to make a convincing experiment
to prove once and for all the experiences of Wilhelm Reich.

I read already the Wilhelm Reich Homepage 5.
Objective Demonstration of the
Orgone Energy(http://www.math.utah.edu/Rgoodman/dorgone.html) and
found it very interesting.
Right now we think that one out of these could be a really
really objective and
impressive demonstration.
>
>I)The Accumulator Electrostatic Effects(electroscope)
>
>J)The Accumulator Ionization Effect(Geiger-Muller tube)
-maybe this takes a little bit too much time

>N)The Orgontester/Fluidometer


We will be thankfull for any further information and experiences or other
sources where to get these. Whether to these experiments or to other even more
impressive experiments.
For example:
How much layers does a very strong accumulator have(special materials)?
How long does the charge of an electroscope usually take to dissipate?

We are one student of psychology
one student of machine engeneering (practically done)
one student of physics.

So don't be afraid of overstretching our mind with theory and information.

Any advice tip and information is welcome.
Just mail it to me or to OML.
Thanks. Marko Heckel
PS:Sorry for my surely awful english (Germany).

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Date: Mon, 01 Apr 96 11:55:00 PST
Subject: Orgonomy in the United Kingdom?
Received: by pore@mainelink.net; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 06:07:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Jon East Jon.East@bbc.co.uk
Message-Id: 316037F4@mail.tv.bbc.co.uk

To: Pore and its readers
Date: 01 April 1996 11:37
Priority: High

To all PORE readers;

My name is Jon East and I work as a director for BBC-TV in London, England.
I am currently in the early stages of trying to research and develop a
documentary film about Wilhelm Reich and the history and current worldwide
status of Orgonomy. My aim is to develop the project on paper and present
it to various commissioning editors in order to obtain financing for
production. I would very much like to hear from anyone involved in a
theoretical or practical way with Orgonomy here in the United Kingdom. I am
particularly interested in work with the orgone energy accumalator and/or
cloudbuster.

I would also like to hear from anyone who has concrete details of the
medical use of the accumalator. I understand that it is used in some German
hospitals to treat cancer - does anyone have a contact name/number/address
for these hospitals or any other institutionally recognised use of the
accumalator and/or cloudbuster and/or DOR-buster? Does anyone have any
contact details for anyone who has used a cloudbuster in a controlled test
situation?

To help in my research I have constructed a 3-ply accumalator strictly
according to plans obtained from the Wilhelm Reich Museum at Orgonon. I
would also like to hear from anyone in the UK (or further afield) who could
advise me on its use.

If you can help then please e-mail me at Jon.East@bbc.co.uk

Or snail mail me at the following address;
Jon East
Room 4430
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TS
United Kingdom.

Or even telephone me from anywhere in the world and I'll ring you straight
back to save your telephone bill (I am in my office between 1000hrs and
1800hrs GMT). My office telephone number is United Kingdom 0181 752 4800. My
fax is 0181 752 5709.

As a programme maker I am supposed to be impartial. However I should like
to encourage a response by reassuring everyone that I have read most of
Reich's innovative writings. I come to this subject as a fascinated layman
who suspects the immense potential value of Orgonomy and emphatically do not
wish to contribute to the hitherto "emotionally plagued" response of the
media to this challenging new science.

Yours faithfully,

Jon East
Director, Features Department
BBC-TV.
Jon East

Date:Thu, 11 Apr 1996, lbond@fastlane.net wrote:

I would like to build an orgone accumulator. I am familiar with
the multi-layered organic/non-orgainic types.

Does anyone know how to build the accumulators built by John
Keely?This type appears to create and store more orgone than the
multi-layered box.

What about the Welz Chi type of generator, does anyone have any
experience?

Thanks for your time,

Lindy Bond
lbond@fastlane.net

Subject: orgone accumulator construction

Fellow students of Orgonomy:
I am about to attempt construction of an orgone accumulator (near the geographic center of Tennessee). Some questions I'd like to ask are: 1. In the original models of the accumulator, Celotex is given as the material for the outer layer. Does this refer to what is commonly known as "tar-board", and are there other suitable materials for the outside? 2. Is use of a bion pack necessary for "activation" of an accumulator, and what are good sources of the "first matter" for such packs? 3. Where can a good working diagram for an orgonoscope be found? Any suggestions you can give in these areas would be appreciated.

ByronH7489@aol.com(click here to send now)

Subject: Re: orgone accumulator construction

I'm know little to nothing about the construction of an accumulator, I've never even seen a diagram or material list for one - please point me in the right direction if such plans do exist. That having been said, I believe Celotex is a company name which may be used in conjunction with more than one material. When I first saw 'Celotex' referenced in the description of an accumulator I assumed they meant a material that is more generically called "sound deadening board" which is/was often called celotex just as facial tissues are usually called kleenex. Sound deadening board can be found at almost any lumber store. It is typically 1/2' or 5/8" thick and sold in 4' x 8' sheets. It is composed of small brownish fibers which have been pressed and bonded together much like wood chips are in particle board. Sound deadening board is quite light and soft, easily broken by hand or cut with a sharp knife. By 'Tar board' do you mean the material commonly used to separate sections of a concrete pour or as backfill protection . If so I think this material is essentially sound deadening board that has been impregnated with tar/asphalt. It seems plain sound deadening board would be a better component in an accumulator. I would love to heard what those with more experience have to say. Hope I haven't mislead anyone.

Keith R. Anderson

Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 20:44:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Orac layers and Orac construction

Just a note concerning the alternative uses of various materials for layers in an accumulator. I support the experimental uses of the various materials but the metals that seem best so far is mainly steel (galvanized to avoid rust) based. As for the organic non conducting layer I have used goose down, plastics, insulation, fiberboard (brand name then was -homocote), wood, --- all with success. You can even paint the steel with a thin coat of metallic paint or oil it. I have even heard of some wallpapering them but haven't tried that myself.

It should be kept in mind as a safer place for this to be set up is outside an electrical house and that humidity must be considered. The organic layer should be a substance that will not absorb humidity as this will impair the performance of the accumulator. I do not recommend shredded newspaper and also the inks in the print on much of newspaper contain several heavy metals for the colors produced in the inks. The Wilhelm Reich's Museum's paper "Notes Regarding the Use of the Accumulator" comes with full graphic plans for the "Construction of a Three-Fold Orgone Energy Accumulator" . There is contained a brief question and answer section regarding the accumulator's use and construction. It also included plans for a shooter funnel for the box seat. They also note that too strong absorption of humidity in the non-metallic layer can lower the strength of the accumulator.

..............................regards Jogg (pore)

Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 15:32:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Intuition about chemicals...

I find the discussion of various chemicals here interesting. I was suprised to read about aspartane being safer than sugar, and then vice-versa, especially since my own experiances with aspertane have been clearly negative, my doctor actually told me to keep away from it. Gives me really bad headaches and makes my hands shake. Our friends at the FDA seem to have jumped the gun on it's approval, in light of the many studies indicating that aspertane is not the wonderfull safe sugar substitute we've been led to beleive it is. Then again, the FDA is pretty notorious for it's, ah, judgemental errors, i.e., the Orgone Energy Accumulator, DMSO, Thalidamide, etc.
I also get the impression here that some feel all chemicals are dangerous, which is, of course, as much a fallacy as insisting all are safe. There are many artifical additives that are significantly safer than "natural" products, the example of the synthetic vitamines was a good point. As far as Accumulator materials go, I am unconvinced that the big Charger I have in the building in my back yard is dangerous just because the non-metallic layers are comprised of synthetic scrap-carpet. I noticed some comments here about Celotex brand insulating materials, and would like to point-out that many Celotex products consist of a ridgid foam backed with an aluminum foil. Technically this is not a particularly good Accumulator layer, since DOR effects have been noted with Accumulators that have aluminum as the metalic layer. On the other hand, there are some Celotex panels with no backing or a paper or plastic backing, and those should be OK to use in Accumulator construction. Like any company Celotex has a varied product line that has changed over the years in order to remain competitive in the building industries. I have an accumulator that has a styrofoam layer as well and use it pretty much on a daily basis. I have observed no negative effects with thease particular "artificial" materials.
It's a good idea to try and be flexable with the materials used in accumulator construction. If you arn't carefull it can become an expensive project. My first full-sized accumulator was pretty expensive, the galvanised steel cost me around a hundred bucks, and I dread to think what the wool blankets I used would cost now. The last full-sized accumulator I built cost only about 12 bucks, as I got the sheet-metal from a salvage yard and the styrofoam "peanuts" and plastic out of a dumpster at a place I worked at the time.
I think my next accumulator, which a friend has asked me to build for him, will be constructed out of scrap-metal and schredded newspaper. Recycling is good!
In our modern world where ac wiring is inside the walls of most homes and our residents abound with microwave ovens, hi-tension overhead power lines, televisions which do give out emf as well as some x radiation, florescent lights which also give out some gamma and x radiation, it's easy to see where the possibility of a bad Orgone reaction may occur in chargers and accumulators kept in the home. Be aware and in tune with your body and your enviourment, if something dosn't feel quite "right" look around. Maby the computer is too close or a flourscent light is excerting some influence...
C. T. Phillips

Subject: Re: re: Re: orgone accumulator

Nick Totton



>There are a whole lot of chemicals in wood (much more complex than most 

>metals).  Trying to limit the amount of chemicals used in the preparation 

>of the wood seems shortsighted, to me, unless one has some idea of which 

>chemicals are "good" organic chemicals, and which chemicals are bad.  

>Does anybody have any reason to think that a carbon-based cell wall in 

>the wood is substantially different than a carbon-based oil used to treat 

>the wood?

>

Hey, let's not get too worried about using exactly the 'right' substance in orgone accumulators. Over the years people have tried a lot of different things, and the consensus is that a wide range of them work. You can substitute a lot of different substances of organic origin for celotex - anything derived from wood, wool, cotton etc is a good bet. The less chemicals involved, the less DOR, in my opinion; so hardboard may not be the best bet, I suspect a lot of chemicals are involoved in its manufacture. Similarly, many inorganic substances will work for the other layer - but some are toxic, e.g. aluminium. In my view, actually, _all_ metals are somewhat DOR-producing over time; I have previously given details of an accumulator using powedered quartz in place of metal. Those of you who have experienced megaluithic orgone accumulators - ancient mounds etc - will know how powerful they can be, and they use altyernating layers e.g. of turf and quartz rock...

Regards ........ Nick Totton

From: C. T. Phillips

My understanding of accumulator therory is that just about any material that can hold a static charge can be used, i.e.: wood, wool, cotton, plastic, paper, carpet, rubber, styrofoam sheets as well as layers of packing foam, etc., all of which I've used. I've had good results with "artificial" materials as well as the natural ones. It's important, however, that materials you use have not been exposed to or contain significant radioactivity -obviously-. For the heavy alternate layers I have used porous stove iron, sheet metal, stainless steel, just about anything I could get my hands on found in salvage yards and in the trash. I don't keep any chargers, accumalators or orgone blankets in the house, as there are way too many T.V.'s, computer monitors transformers, oscilliscopes and appliances with transformers to risk a DOR reaction. So my orgonometric devices reside in a building in my back yard. It's generally not a good idea to be overexposed to high orgone charges for more than a half hour or so a day anyhow. I havn't tried powdered quartz yet, though, and appreciate the mention, as my curiousity is peaked. And the mention of the burial mounds is particularly interesting to me because of a strange incident that happened when I visited a indian burial mound a few years ago. The odd feelings I had there now make a little more sense !

C. T. Phillips
zzippy@concentric.net

Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 10:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Orac layers and Orac construction

pore@mainelink.net wrote:

[edited]
> It should be kept in mind as a safer place for this to be set up is outside
> an electrical house and that humidity must be considered.

Is there any safe way for us city-dwellers to experiment with an ORAC? I
live in an older building (19th century), probably with old wiring.
There is a flourescent light in my kitchen, and 2 smoke detectors with
Americium elements in the apartment (not under my control: hard-wired by
the
landlord). I have no access to any outdoor sheds.

I talked to a guy who had been safely experimenting with a small
coffee-can type accumulator in NYC, until they installed a laundry-mat
below his apartment, and he then had very strong toxic effects (from all
of the electrical elements in the dryers, I assume). Well, I don't have a
laundry-mat under my apartment. How safe is it?

I have all the materials together to build a 10-fold box type accumulator
on DeMeo's design. It is just a matter of layering the plastic and wool
and setting the steel box in the wood box. I havn't done it yet, out of
concerns about a possible DOR reaction.

A tangible DOR reaction would be, for me, confirmation of an
orgone energy accumulator's effects (which is what I am looking for).
Even if I could just control the intensity of the DOR reaction somehow,
and clean it up quickly, I would consider this a successful experiment.

I'm not out to convince anyone other than myself of this. I have read
Reich for a while now, and am certainly open to the possibility of the
accumulator's effects, but I need to see it (feel it?) for myself to
believe it.

Any suggestions?

Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 14:41:12 -0400 (EDT)

Subject: Re: Orac layers and Orac construction

On building an accumulator for city-dwellers for confirmation purposes: go ahead if you are aware of what DOR effects to look for. I wouldn't, however, reccommend building a ten-fold accumulator in a city apartment, because a ten-fold accumulator is pretty powerfull. The most I've ever experimented with was a 15-fold accumulator ALSO CALLED A CHARGER. I have found that when I put my hand in this charger, I notice a warm and tingling sensation almost immediately. It has some holes in it lined with plastic tubing, the sides are about 16 inches thick, and there's only one square foot of space inside it. The temperature inside this particular charger varies from about .8 degrees to as much as 3.6 degrees higher than the air temperature outside the device. Weather seems to be the factor influencing the variations in inside temperature. Keep in mind that the more layers a charger has, the more significant the possible DOR reaction. If you notice a "heavy" and dark and oppressive feeling and feel dizzy/nautious/unable to concentrate, I suggest you disassemble the device immediately if you have it in a city apartment, or anywhere else there may be radation or radioactive particles. A smoke detector that's in another room should not be too hazardous, as the amount of material is very small. I wouldn't put a smoke detector in a charger, though. ((I know that may sound patronising, but it wasn't intended to, you'd be suprised what a curious person can do !)) The best thing someone in the city could do if curious about accumulator and charger effects is to have a small DOR buster. You have running water, and some pipe and flexable metal tubing is all the extra stuff you need. I have some flexable conduit connected to some pipe, I set one end of the conduit in the sink with water in it, and the other end is connected to the pipe. Every once and a while I use this contraption to clear the air in my room where I have my computer, tv and oscilloscopes. I leave it overnight or all day while I'm at work. The faucet to the kitchen sink need only be running a slight drizzle, and the drain to the adjoing sink is open so that the overflow drains away into it. This is basically a DOR buster, and could be indenspensible for those who want to experiment with accumulators in possible DOR enviourments. We have the advantage of knowing about the DOR buster before we build an accumulator, Reich, on the other hand, was in a mad rush to create this device after the disasterous Oranur experiment. We are very fortunate, indeed !

C. T. Phillips

Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 19:52:54 -5
Subject: Re: orgone shooters
Received: by pore@ime.net; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 20:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael Clements" orgonome@mail.enter.net
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU



> I just got the plans for an orgone accumulator and shooter from the W.R.
> Museum in Maine. The project seems too expensive for me using the
> materials listed. I am a little confused on what materials can be used
> (cotton balls, wool, wood, brillo pads, plastic?????). Anyone have
> experience building an effective accumulator or shooter with materials
> cheaper and more readily available than fiberglass, steel, and the rest?

In 1979 I constructed an small accumulator that worked well in
Seattle for a year but I could never get to work in Riyadh Saudi
Arabia. (try getting one through customs once!)

1. I had a sheet metal worker who makes ducting for home heating systems
make a 1 foot by 1 foot by 1 foot box out of galvanized sheet metal
(same stuff he always used.) I asked him to make it openable but
with a tight fitting lid (side).

This box was ready in several days. I then went to the local
hardware store (there were no Home Depots) and bought some spun glass
insulation which had paper on both sides. I made sure it had no
formaldehyde in it or used in making it by calling the manufaturer
and so on. I wrapped one layer around all sides of my metal box.

I spend a month trying to find steel wool in other than brillo pad
size.

---if anyone could help me NOW to find steel wool now in a roll or size
that could be used to cover a floor or wall I would appreciate it. I
can find no supplier now. I have called several companies listed on
steel wool pads with no response.----

I found a roll of steel wool about 3 or 4 feet high and about an inch thick.
It unraveled like a carpet. I then wrapped this steel wool around the
fiberglass insulation. I then wrapped another layer of fiberglass
insulation around that. I then wrapped steel wool around that and
fiber glass around that

I then pressed on the outside of the now multilayer box to get its
dimentions. The fiberglass and steel wool was very compressible. I
decided what size of sheet metal box would contain the current box
tightly.

I then went to the sheet metal worker and told him I wanted the same
sort of box I ordered at first but with the new dimensions. In this
way I made an accumulator of more than 12 layers with a final layer
of steel wool and fiberglass insulation on the outside.

I visited a housing construction side and asked for the flexible
iron electical tubing. This is just a thin strip of iron twisted
around itself to make a length of flexible tubing. They gave me a
scrap piece of 6 feet of so. I suppose any electrical supply place
for building home or skyscrapers would have some.

I then went around to all the farm supply places with a magnet until
I found an iron funnel. I would recommend bringing a magnet to the
sheet metal workers place and when looking for the flexible iron
tubing. I supposed the sheet metal worker could have made one.

I put the smallest hole I could into the sheet metal boxes to insert
the flexible tubing. On the inside of the smallest box I tightened a
hose clamp around the flexible iron tubing to hold it inside and then
threaded the tubing through all the other boxes. I used duct tape to
hold the funnel into the other end of the flexible tubing.

And voila!. it worked! I cost me about $50 or so. Most of it for
the sheet metal worker. He asked me what I was doing. I told him it
was an experiment. I lived in a small town and my job might not have
survived the rumors.

A year later, before I had my brother send the accumulator to me in
Saudi, his 7 year old son picked up the funnel and reported that it
was unusually warm when he put his hand inside. My brother (who
knows nothing about orgone and thinks I am crazy to have any interest
in a W. Reich or "life energy" would not have known
what to tell his son to say.) My wife's family used it with
amazement and success (tic de la rue, etc) when they visited me but
refused to aknowledge the accumulator's existance unless with me.

Mike C

I am interested now in building a medical DOR buster. I had one once
that worked "as advertised" but went to Saudi Arabia before I could
get much experience with it. My brother threw it out after I was
gone for 8 years.

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Date: 16 Aug 96 07:06:10 EDT
From: Nick Totton <100532.2353@compuserve.com>
To: orgonomy   orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: canned food

< If one were to wrap a (steel) can of beans with a piece of
woollen cloth and leave in a fresh dry place for a while would
that then "charge" the beans, thus making them better to eat?
                      Lawrence Pendred>

This doesn't exactly answer your question, but I know that people have experimented with growing seedlings, one half with a steel can plus its labelling paper (ie a simple ready made accumulator) around them, the other half as controls.

It's reported that the steel can seedlings grew bigger and faster. I can probably dig the material out if you're seriously interested.

I( doubt that beans which are already developed could be improved by an accumulator. Accumulators are good for _living_ tissues. Dead beans can't take up a charge of orgone, and nor (imho) can we take up orgone by eating it!)

regards

Nick Totton

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

To: pore@mainelink.net
Subject: Re: question?

There is an instrument described in a booklet "The Orgone
Energy Accumulator - its scientific and medical use" by Wilhelm
Reich. This instrument is a vacuum tube of .5 micron pressure
used to illuminate orgone.

Does anyone know of anyone that has constructed or used these tube
circuits?
Thanks
GLeg@aol.com

Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 20:09:59 +0200 (METDST)
From: Andreas Hoppe   hoppe@math.tu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: canned food
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

> ><If one were to wrap a (steel) can of beans with a piece of woollen cloth and leave in a fresh dry place for a while would >that then "charge" the beans, thus making them better to eat?

> >Lawrence Pendred>>

> >This doesn't exactly answer your question, but I know that people have >experimented with growing seedlings, one half with a steel can plus its >labelling paper (ie a simple ready made accumulator) around them, the other half >as controls.

> >It's reported that the steel can seedlings grew bigger and faster. I can >probably dig the material out if you're seriously interested.

> >I( doubt that beans which are already developed could be improved by an >accumulator. Accumulators are good for _living_ tissues. Dead beans can't take >up a charge of orgone, and Reich found a very high amount of orgone charge in sea sand which is more dead than cooked beans (if that makes sense) - such a high amount that it enabled tpo actually discover orgone!

> nor (imho) can we take up orgone by eating it!)

I understand that the orgone charge of the food is a main ingredient of it. That's one of the reasons that highly processed food is proven to be not healthy. Some chemical food has lots of chemical energy, minerals, proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins and is still unhealthy. And this can be explained by the orgone charge of the food.

So I think it is not impossible that the beans are indeed charged and slightly more nutritional than beans stored in glass. Should be resolved by an experiment.

What I suspect is that the quantity of energy taken by the beans is very low. But anyway it seems still absurd to me to rob the beans of their orgone charge during procession and recharge them afterwards. As absurd as isolating some substances of fresh orange juice to a nasty, nutritionless concentrate and put them later together with water, sugar, calcium and vitamins and to think that this is as good as fresh orange juice.

But some interesting questions arise:
What happens with the orgone in an sealed ORAC? It cannot accumulate infinitely but on what depends the maximum quantity? If air can circulate in and out of the ORAC it levels the charge off but if it is closed?

                                     _\|/_
                                   ( O - )
-------------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------------------------------------
Urizano http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/~hoppe/
AndreasHoppe .ooOO OOoo. hoppe@math.tu-berlin.de
                              ( ) ( )
--------------------\ (-----) /----------------------------------------
                            \_) (_/

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 23:44:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: pore@ime.net
Subject: Re: Orgone sleeping bag
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, "Jose' Guilherme C. Oliveira" jgco@ax.ibase.org.br    wrote:
>I have tried out something between an ORAC and a blanket, it's an >orgone sleeping bag. Seems to me to have a stronger effect than the >blanket, and is more practical and cheaper than the full box.

> >The one I made had 3 layers on the upper part, and just one layer below.

>-- >José Guilherme Couto de Oliveira
>(take a lookat my orgonomy page in the web)
>http://www.ax.apc.org/~jgco/orgonomy.htm

> > > > --- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Hi to all,
I received this response to the below sleeping bag idea. They made some very valid points that I thought I would share with you. I also add that one would be wise to have an alarm to avoid falling asleep and staying in these devices too long.
....................Jogg (pore)

Below is part of what I received from germany.
********************************

Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 17:01:52 -0400
From: Beate Freihold <106260.2377@compuserve.com>
Subject: sleeping bag
To: Jogg <pore@mainelink.net>

Hi Jogg,
we have review your mails.
To the sleeping bag: we produce every device, what people want. But with the sleeping back this idea has some problems.
1. The zip fastener, what is for funktion not necessary, makes a lot of work.
2. It is better you can qick go out of the blanket
3.In a close bag maybe you fall in sleep. That`s happen to a friend of us under an orgone blanket and after he must go into the hospital.
4. A problem is also perspire.
We think an open system like a big blanket is better. You have more move. Our blankets are very large. It is like an sleeping bag. Also I can´t believe that a blanket works better as an orac.

For us I think it`s good to produce a large blanket with only 1 layer. That makes it easy and cheaper (weight for sending). In future we can show a such blanket on our blanket-site at the web. What do you think about? .

Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:49:44 -0200
From: "Jose' Guilherme C. Oliveira" <jgco@ax.ibase.org.br>
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: Orgone sleeping bag

Mary Johnson wrote:

> > Jose' Guilherme C. Oliveira wrote:
> > I have tried out something between an ORAC and a blanket, it's an > > orgone sleeping bag. The one I made had 3 layers on the upper part, and just one > > layer below. >

> Did I miss it, or have you already told how you make your orgone sleeping bag? I did > check out your web site, but did not find this information. Could you let me know?

> > Thanks
> MK Johnson
> Kalispell, Montana USA
> mjohnson@digisys.net

> = > --- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
_______________________________________________
To build the orgone sleeping bag, I just sowed two orgone blankets onto each other, with a zipper or velcro on one side to let you close yourself in. =

You just have to be careful to ensure that the blankets are sown in such a way, that the side of each blanket that's normally supposed to face the body (steel wool face) stays on the inside of the sleeping bag, still facing the body. In my case I used a 3 layered blanket above and a one layered blanket below.
I recommend making it wide enough to leave space for shoulder movement, you'll need it to close yourself in.
About the construction of an orgone blanket you can take a look at http://www.mainelink.net/~pore/1aoblkt1.htm -- =

Jos=E9 Guilherme Couto de Oliveira
http://www.ax.apc.org/~jgco/index.htm

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:39:03 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Andreas Hoppe <hoppe@math.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: More accumulator construction
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

Hi OML!

Jessie (jessiez@tiac.net) asked:

>- Should the ceiling and floor of a free standing accumulator be made out
>of layers, too? Does it matter? Could they be made out of wood? Or is the
>whole point that the accumulator is a cube of layers?

Yes, the point is that the ORAC is completetly enveloped in layers. Especially the ceiling is important - the cosmic Orgone stream reaches the earth mostly from above. Tangential (to the earths surface) Orgon can be absorbed by atmosphere humidity to a greater extent. (O.K. this is just a theoretical thought and it is not sure if it can be applied in analogy to electromagnetic energy - it must be checked out.)

Other Orgone devices like Orgone pillows are not completely covered with layers but are considered to have a considerably weaker accumulation effect.

>
>- The inside layer should be steel, right? If this is the case, would it be
>OK if it was steel wool held up by something like chicken wire instead of
>being a solid sheet of steel?

Yes. The point of the ORAC construction is that the inner layer is made of metal.

Robert Richter (Vienna, Austria) makes Orgone Pillows with the last steel layer of a steel sieve wire net - the wires about 1mm, holes about 2mm.

I haven't heard anything definite if there are any problems if the steel layer is not solid or how large the holes can be. A hypothetical thought: A net of writes could be used to discriminate Orgone (in analogy to electromagnetic waves) - what about an Oranur-Blocker-ORAC?!

>
>- Is it OK for the outside layer to be made out of plywood? Or should it be
>soundstop board? Or does it not matter?

For some reason James DeMeo doesn't like wood for an ORAC especially plywood and prefers this soundstop board (although I think it is more about the inner non-metallic layers). (see: "Orgon Accumulator Handbook") I have seen several ORACs made of wood as the outermost layer.

Cheers Andreas

--                                     _\|/_
                                      ( O - )
-------------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------------------------------------
Urizano http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/~hoppe/
AndreasHoppe .ooOO OOoo. hoppe@math.tu-berlin.de
                               ( ) ( )
--------------------\ (-----) /----------------------------------------
                            \_) (_/

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 19:07:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: pore@ime.net
Message-Id: <199609142307.TAA07559@ime.net>
Subject: Re: More accumulator construction ?s
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

Answers are below each question:

On Sat, 14 Sep 1996, jessiez@tiac.net (Jessie Zoldak) wrote:
>Thanks to everyone who sent me hints in reply to my orgone accumulator construction query.

>
>I've done a bit more research, and have just a few more specific questions. Any answers / opinions would be greatly appreciated.

>
>- For the steel wool, I am unrolling steel wool pads and stretching them out into squares which are about 12" by 12". Is this right?

The size is not important for unrolled steel wool. It is important that as you lay the steel wool over a cotton layer to be sure that it is not easy to see the coton below the layer of steel wool. Wilhelm Reich also used metal screen (steel or iron based) for layers instead of steel wool. This was done on some of the ones he produced but not all. It is an alternative to the steel wool.

>- Should the ceiling and floor of a free standing accumulator be made out of layers, too? Does it matter? Could they be made out of wood? Or is the whole point that the accumulator is a cube of layers?
>

The point is to have a rectangular box to sit in with the sides, bottom and top within a few inches (4 to 8) from your body when sitting on a bench built in or a chair inside of the ORAC. All sides, bottom, and top are layered usually 3 to 5 layers of cotton/steel wool.

>- The inside layer should be steel, right? If this is the case, would it be OK if it was steel wool held up by something like chicken wire instead of >being a solid sheet of steel?

As previously stated you could use screening (iron based- not aluminium ). If you try chicken wire be sure it is iron based. Most ORACs were all constructed with iron sheet metal or galvanized iron sheet metal for the interior walls. We have been told on OML previous that a furnace person obtained the metal sheets and cut them for someone (M.C.?) who is a member of the OML.

>- Is it OK for the outside layer to be made out of plywood? Or should it be soundstop board? Or does it not matter?
>

The outside layer can be plywood, wood particle board, or sound board/ fiberboard. The first two have raised chemical glue product concerns of some current person who build them. In the 1940's and 1950's the first two possibilities for material didn't exist yet. They all seem to work.

>Again, thanks for any help.

>
>-- Jessie
> jessiez@tiac.net

You are welcome.

PS cotton is not the only substance that can be used. Wool, silk, and other plant or animal fibers can be used. Rock wool was used by Reich a lot. I have even used goose down feathers which worked great but had the problem of getting damp and asorbing moisture which decreases the strength of the ORAC.

.............regards Jogg

--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Dear Seeker,
Thankyou for replying to my net message. The interest is in those who may be active with the accumulator (not generator) as I requested yesterday. I am keen to find someone who has possibly built one of these accumulators here in Australia, hopefully in my home town of Sydney. It would seem that authorities of the dark ages were very keen to suppress the work of Mr Reich. Nicola Tesla was on to things similar, and he was also subjected to similar opposition. I am interested in this energy as a healing source, and as a commercial photographer, also interested in Kirlian photography. It would sound as though your page is something of a focal point to these activitys, and if I have any success with my efforts I will zap of some giff's/text on my findings. I was quite blown away to find your web page and may I say thank you for your mail, and any assistance you may provide.

Yours, Robert McDonnell.
Sydney 17th/1500HrsEST

I have wondered for several years about a penomenon I observed when I stored my 40 layer accumulator in a storage shed for several months.

When I went to move it, it had been stored as a giant bed, of 200 layers, there was a fine white crystal substance that had gathered behind it between the accumulator and the wall.

Several grams of the material had formed, maybe two ounces, I gathered some up but never got to test it.

Crystals were long like cotton candy, and the y melted when they were in the container after several hours.

Has anyone obsereved anything like this?

I have not had an acumulator for more than 15 years but when I did in LA/Hollywood area I would do cloud buster and other kinds of things.

Eva Riech showed up and told me it was the largest one she had seen in a long time.

Has anyone assembled rooms lately.

I would use 4 x 8 foot sheets of galvanized sheet metl and bond poly urthane foam,2inches thick to it.

I would call on such piece a layer.

I would assemble it into structures that could be entered alone ofr in groups

. I found that I you would make structures in structures in structure the fartherout effects would increase.

Is anyone working with larger structures.

Has anyone come across the staticy blue fuzz balls that sort of roll around?

I would plug it into the toilet with flexable hollow steel cable tubes. Major increase in effect, Anyone ever try pulling into tolet.

Flushiong toilet while in orac with several cables had profound effect on the ocupants.

Anyone notice the effect on the tonge when places close to inner layer of multi layer accumulators.

Anyone else ever slept for months in an accumulator.

Does any of this make any sense to anyone?

I would like to go for greater scale. Anyone in Hawaii working in this area?

Jay Lawrence Friedheim
jfriedheim@aol.com

• Return to PORE main page
• See our Email address, Disclaimers, Copyright, Trademark. and Article submission statements

---

---

  LE FastCounter    In effect on several pages since October 16, 1998

---

---